Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Council meeting on illegal tire dumping gets heated

Council meeting on illegal tire dumping gets heated

Posted: Nov 26, 2012 8:22 AM EST Updated: Nov 26, 2012 6:51 PM EST
ATLANTA - Some angry Atlanta residents told local lawmakers on Monday that they're tired of being dumped on.  They told city leaders they don't want old tires discarded in their neighborhoods.

Atlanta City Councilwoman Joyce Sheperd held the meeting to discuss proposed legislation aimed at cracking down on illegal tire dumping.  Sheperd says illegal dumping of tires is perpetrated by carriers hauling used tires from tire sellers to "end users," who are supposed to burn them or otherwise get rid of them. She says they've come up with a multi-pronged approach.
Things got so heated at Monday's meeting that Sheperd threatened to cut off public comment.

The city council is dusting off a six-month old proposal, and is now ready to vote on a law to cut down tens of thousands of tires left in vacant lots, on the street, and according to residents almost everywhere--- except in wealthy communities.

But regardless of where you live in the city, all Atlantans are affected by the problem.  You see, the City of Atlanta pays for the disposal of these tires-- at a cost of $7.00 a piece.  But, the market rate is no more than $2.00 when a private company does it.  The proposed law would cut down on the number of scrap tires an operator can have.  Currently, that number is a maximum of 3,000 tires, but the new law would cut that number to 500 tires.  All tires must be taken to an approved environmental disposal site, and according to Sheperd, they would require operators to put identification marks on the tires in their inventory.  That way, if the tires were dumped, they would be able to be tracked.

If the new law passes, Atlanta police would be left to impose fines, which if unpaid could lead to jail time.  The first formal vote on the issue comes Tuesday.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Women of Color and Political Leadership         

 By Sophia Kerby

Women of color are largely underrepresented in elected positions across the board, comprising just 4.5 percent of the total 535 members of Congress, with similar representation in state legislatures, and even less across statewide offices. Which begs the questions: What is the political power of women of color?


Monday, October 8, 2012

Opportunity zone in southwest Atlanta

Atlanta newest “opportunity zone” touted as way to spur jobs, lower poverty

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Invest Atlanta, the city’s economic development agency, applauded Georgia’s designation of new “opportunity zone” in Atlanta. The new zone is the area bounded by White Street and Lee Street in southwest Atlanta. New or existing businesses located within an opportunity zone are eligible for a yearly income tax credit of $3,500 for each new job created as long as they create at least two net new jobs. The annual tax credit is good for up to five years, meaning a business could be eligible for up to $17,500 in tax credits if it hired at least two new people per year.

Friday, October 5, 2012

Race and Beyond: Coming Together to Help Black Boys and Men

Improving the lives of black boys and men is not an impossible task.
When groups of concerned people gather to discuss black boys and men, the conversation all too often degrades into a hopeless discussion of problems and pathologies.
Yawn.

There’s nothing new to add to that tired trope, especially for anyone with a passing awareness of the enduring history and the contemporary plight of black males in our country. But what is being done about the stacks of studies and statistics that point to a disproportionate number of black boys and men trapped in the school-to-prison pipeline?

Frankly, far more than most of us know. I was reminded of this at a roundtable meeting convened earlier this week by the Center for Law and Social Policy, or CLASP, a Washington-based group that advocates for the interests of low-income Americans. About two dozen academics, grassroots activists, community-based organizers, and policy experts gathered in the CLASP conference room to talk about their work, offering success strategies that are improving the lives of and outcomes for black boys and men.
Describing the gathering as a “partnership circle meeting,” Linda Harris, who directs youth policy for CLASP, set the tone for the conversation by noting that everyone in attendance did valuable and important work. But not everyone in the room knew about each other’s work. Because people work in isolated silos, alone in their laboratories, or one-off in think-tank cubicles, the potential for synergy between their successful discoveries is often lost in the soulless proliferation of book chapters and white papers.
Harris suggested each of us in the group imagine ourselves as motorists on a vast and broad superhighway leading to an agreed-upon destination. We all want to make it easier for black boys and men to maintain good jobs, wages, and careers. But along this road, the various groups and organizations assembled at the meeting—“partners in the black men and boys’ journey,” to use Harris’s language—have different on-ramps or entry points. Each of us moves along the route at varying speeds with our heads down and our eyes trained on our specific tasks. We are often clueless of what others are doing at different places on our shared pathway.
As a result, when we do talk about what’s happening with black boys and men, the common and default mode tends toward the recitation of dismal statistics. Sure, the challenges are there in the numbers: 6.7 million—approximately one in six, or 16 percent—of all young people (ages 16 to 24, both male and female) are disconnected from school and work. But for young black males, the numbers are worse—almost double at 32 percent.
Supported by the Open Society Foundations’ Campaign for Black Male Achievement, CLASP sought to give us something else to talk about, to provide us an opportunity and space to share strategies about how to make a positive impact on black boys and young men. It was a refreshing conversation. I learned, for example, that:
  • Sharon Davies, executive director of the Kirwan Institute at Ohio State University, drafted and filed an amicus brief on behalf of her institute in the Fisher v. University of Texas case—an upcoming, affirmative action case before the Supreme Court to determine whether race may be used in college admission policies. Oral arguments in the case are planned next month. Davies said it’s critical that colleges be allowed to use race-specific criteria in college admissions to increase opportunities for black youth and especially for black males, who are disproportionately absent on college campuses.
  • Michael Lindsey, a professor and researcher in the University of Maryland School of Social Work, is assessing the mental health and social development needs for school-aged black boys. He explained how recognizing and addressing their unique health needs, which tend to go untreated in communities where these boys face high stress from racism, poverty, and joblessness, can result in better educational outcomes for black boys.
  • Al Young Jr., a sociology professor at the University of Michigan, is demonstrating how social forces such as racism, poverty, and joblessness shape the attitudes of black boys and men toward education and work. He noted how his research contradicts the common view that black males don’t study hard because they doubt it will lead to improved life outcomes. Rather, his research shows that when black males viewed work in a productive fashion, their willingness to stay in school increased.
  • Ron Walker, executive director of the Boston-based Coalition of Schools Educating Boys of Color—a network of public, private, and charter single-sex schools that focus exclusively on improving educational outcomes for young black males—is refocusing the narrative about black males to “talk about solutions, not problems.” Walker said that “black boys learn more from success than from failure.”
As these conversations bounced around the room, ideas flowed and new alliances were formed. What once seemed an impossible task—improving the lives of black boys and men—seemed less daunting. No doubt that’s because those of us who traffic the less-traveled road of looking for solutions to the problems facing black boys and men took a moment to pause in our drive toward success and recognize a fellow traveler. Knowing someone is on the road with you makes the journey a lot less lonely.


This material  was published by the Center for American Progress (http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/race/news/2012/09/25/39198/race-and-beyond-coming-together-to-help-black-boys-and-men/)

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

The Stealth Inequities of School Funding

How State and Local School Finance Systems Perpetuate Inequitable Student Spending
By Bruce D. Baker and Sean P. Corcoran 

Education has been called the passport to the future. It has been defined as the great equalizer and lauded as being a key to unlocking the American Dream. Yet too many children—often low-income and minority children—are denied access to high-quality education because they attend schools that are underfunded and under-resourced. The sad reality is that gross funding inequities continue to exist in this country, and too often the schools serving students with the greatest needs receive the fewest resources This report tackles the serious issue of public school funding inequity by identifying often-overlooked features of school funding systems that exacerbate inequities in per-pupil spending rather than reduce them. 

Read more and download this report here. This material was published by the Center for American Progress (http://www.americanprogress.org/events/2012/09/11/37464/stealth-inequities-of-school-funding/)

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Atlanta City Council passes amended panhandling ordinance


In a unanimous vote, the Atlanta City Council passes a compromise ordinance cracking down on "aggressive panhandling".
The earlier version had called for up to 180 days in jail on the first offense.  Mayor Reed vetoed it.
The new version sets up a series of penalties:  up to 30 days community service on the first offense; at least 30-days in jail for the second; and at least 90 days behind bars on the third.
At the same time, the compromise makes tightens up the definition of "aggressive" begging:   those who continue to accost citizens after being told "no".

"This legislation protects our citizens from those wolves who -- to the detriment of those truly in need -- cloak themselves in sheep's clothing," says Councilman Michael Bond  Critics of the earlier ordinance complained it was unfair to the poor.

The mayor is expected to sign the compromise plan.  The new law would apply citywide.  The vote was 14-0.

This article was published by WSBRADIO.com (http://www.wsbradio.com/news/news/atlanta-city-council-passes-amended-panhandling-or/nSRCG/)